Liberal Repercussion

http://www.johnkaminski.com/fatalflaw.htm

This is quite interesting. Bear in mind, I am a major tinfoil hat type, but for me, that means that I will consider all options. And I preface this by stating that the fall of the Towers LOOKED like a controlled demolition to me, that was my immediate impression as I watched it. And I have difficulty resolving that. I have watched tall building construction from an aerial perch as well as destruction. It's just my opinion, and I am anxious to examine facts in favor of and against that notion.

What is strange is that here is where my interests coincide with a lot of annoying libertarians as well as some otherwise completely batshit Republicans I know. THEY don't accept the present level of information regarding the 9-11 incident either.

I don't think this means I am turning into a winger. I think it means that many aspects of 9-11 confound common sense. For instance, our failure to scramble military jets when it became known that hijackings were occurring. (Remember, course deviations and ALL those damn cell phone calls?) A few gruesomely uninformed people have told me that it just takes too long to deploy jets in that fashion. I don't accept that for one moment, no matter what the excuse. It is not acceptable, albeit somewhat conceivable that the chain of command moved too slowly, but what are we to draw from THAT?

Anyhow...

The Fatal Flaw In The 9/11 Coverup

Why can no one name the hijackers
or prove they flew the planes?


By John Kaminski
skylax@comcast.net

4-16-04

Know how to tell the difference between the truth and lies of 9/11? If they're talking about hijackers having done the dastardly deed, you know they're part of the sinister coverup extravaganza, wittingly or not.

In order for the people of the world to be convinced that Islamic hijackers were responsible for terrible tragedy of 9/11, we need to see some evidence. Not hearsay, innuendo, aspersion or promises of evidence, but real evidence.

Otherwise, the whole subject is rightly regarded as a ruse, a setup to conceal the identities of the real culprits, the ones who sit smugly in front of the TV cameras and plot their cynical war on terror — otherwise known as the war on the peoples of the world.

Why did FBI director Robert Mueller say very publicly to the Commonwealth Club of San Francisco that nothing on paper connected Arab terrorists to 9/11? I mean, two and half years have passed. And the feds produced 19 names within 72 hours of the disaster. Notice a mathematical inconsistency here? All that has happened since is mere vigilante hysteria, hypothetical scenarios trumpeted ad nauseum by America’s notoriously brainwashed Zionist press.

Seven or eight of the names on that original list have been found living comfortably in other countries. Why hasn’t the FBI made any attempt to correct the errors made on that original list? See for yourself.

http://members.fortunecity.com/911/september-eleven/hijackers-alive.htm and http://www.welfarestate.com/911/

And why, after much hullabaloo about Colin Powell using phony information in his remarks to the United Nations about the reasons for war, hasn’t the U.S. government produced a single conclusive piece of evidence to back up its claim that 9/11 was the work Osama bin Laden and other Islamic terrorists? Not a single piece!




Read more at the links. It won't hurt you to do so.

posted by Rei Toei @ 11:36 a.m.