Liberal Repercussion

On, Wisconsin!
- - - - - - - - - - - -
By David Moberg

Oct. 7, 2004 | In the presidential battleground state of Wisconsin,
West Allis is a political free-fire zone where a guerrilla campaign
is being waged house to house. In this old, inner-ring suburb of
Milwaukee, George W. Bush beat Al Gore in 2000 by just 184 votes out
of 29,050 cast -- and some precincts were split precisely in half.
West Allis is still starkly divided, and no issue is more divisive
than the war in Iraq.

The suburb's residents are largely aging, white, working- and middle-
class families, many of whom have bumped through long layoffs and
wrenching job changes as global economic forces and unsupportive
public policies have roiled the highly skilled manufacturing
industries of southeast Wisconsin. While their economic interests and
worries may tilt them toward the Democrats, concern about taxes,
social conservatism (especially opposition to abortion) and now
anxieties about war or terrorism tilt many to the Republicans.

On streets of comfortable but modest bungalows and ranch houses
decorated with ambitious displays of Halloween ghosts, jack-o'-
lanterns and witches, ubiquitous yard signs for Kerry-Edwards are
typically juxtaposed with signs for Bush-Cheney. But the steady
stream of people knocking on doors these days are not trick-or-
treaters. They are canvassers on behalf of the presidential
candidates, assiduously pursuing "lazy Republicans" or "swing
Democrats" before a final blitz to get every voter to the polls -- or
better yet, to vote absentee in advance.

The broadcast "air war" in Wisconsin is intense. The state is one of
the top five in overall television and radio advertising by or for
the presidential candidates, according to the Wisconsin Advertising
Project. The Center for Public Integrity reports that since last June
Wisconsin has been the top state for advertising for both sides by
the independent "527" groups, named after the tax code provision that
permits their existence -- such as the Swift Boat Veterans and
Progress for America Voter Fund (the top spender) for Bush and the
Media Fund and MoveOn.org Voter Fund for John Kerry.

Both sides agree that the race in Wisconsin could very well be as
close as it was in 2000. Then Gore won by 5,708 votes out of nearly
2.5 million (with 94,070 going to Ralph Nader, who once again is on
the ballot). The state has a Democratic governor, two Democratic
senators (including incumbent Russell Feingold, favored strongly for
reelection), an even split among the eight members of the U.S. House,
and both houses of the state Legislature under the control of
conservative Republicans. It has produced politicians ranging from
red-baiting Republican Sen. Joe McCarthy to Earth Day founder
Democratic Sen. Gaylord Nelson. Hardcore Democratic strongholds in
Milwaukee, Madison and the far north balance the Republican
strongholds in other rural areas and the suburbs. Going into the
first presidential debate, Bush led in the polls, which ranged from
three statistical ties to three other polls showing Bush leading by
eight to 14 points (numbers that even Bush partisans dismissed as far-
fetched).

Both sides also agree that with a tight contest, the electoral war is
likely to be determined by the boots on the ground -- the armies of
paid and volunteer workers who have spent many months trying to
register new voters, identify supporters, persuade the undecided, and
eventually get every possible friendly voter to the polling places.
On that front, Kerry seems to have the advantage, even though
Republicans have been trying since 2002 to gear up an effort to
combat the old-fashioned politicking that the labor movement has
revived with great success since 1996. Groups supporting Kerry -- or
doing work that indirectly helps Kerry -- have a larger and more
diverse effort on the ground, which nearly every knowledgeable
participant describes as unprecedented in size, scope and
sophistication.

In the days after the first presidential debate, it appeared that
Kerry had done well enough among the remaining sliver of persuadable
or undecided voters to tighten the race in Wisconsin and make the
ground war even more critical. Equally important, his performance
energized the foot soldiers, those who have to endure hours of
knocking on doors of empty homes, snarling dogs and hostile
rejections by partisans of their opponent.

The morning after the first debate, Ken Morton, 32, a food-service
manager for the Milwaukee Public Schools, and Reyna Rundberg, 56, a
nursing-home worker from Chicago, gathered at the headquarters of the
Milwaukee County Labor Council to start yet another day of intensive
political work, modeled on a union organizing drive. They would drive
through West Allis and try to track down undecided union members and
persuade them to vote for Kerry. Both are among the 2,038 "Heroes"
the Service Employees International Union has recruited, reimbursing
their salaries, for months of work in 11 battleground states.

As Rundberg drove her aging Nissan sedan in search of the first
person on their list, she and Morton excitedly reviewed Kerry's best
jabs in the debate. Rundberg liked how Kerry contrasted his awkward
explanation of his vote on $87 billion for Iraq with Bush's bigger
mistake of rushing to war. Morton thought Kerry scored when he chided
Bush for not listening "to what his own father said about Iraq"
becoming an occupation nightmare. Both had become much more
passionate about politics after the Florida voting debacle in 2000
and were excited to be able to take off from work to campaign. But
Morton admitted that until recently he'd felt "leery" about Kerry,
worrying that he hadn't spelled out his plans clearly enough. No
longer. "I'm fired up," he said. The debate "was exciting. I didn't
think it would be so clear."


Despite the fruitless search for many of the people on their list
(and one curt rebuff from a Bush supporter), their quest may have
helped nudge a few votes to Kerry. Retired electrician James Preston
remained undecided, but reports of the debate (which he had
inadvertently slept through) impressed him. "We are at war," he
said. "No matter what the economy is, this country's at war. But I
actually think Bush got us into it, and I don't approve of how he did
it. He should have consulted with other nations." Ninety-two-year-old
Evelyn Kluever, on the other hand, was enthusiastically for Kerry,
even though she thought he should fight back harder against Bush. And
she was hopeful that Arthur -- her more taciturn live-in partner, a
retired union member leaning toward Bush -- had been swayed toward
Kerry.

Kevin Mahnke, a foundry worker and union member, aptly characterized
the conflicting pulls from each campaign. "Before the debate, I kind
of had my mind made up [for Bush], but afterwards I wasn't so sure,"
he said, standing in front of his apartment door, decorated with
a "Support Our Troops" poster. Mahnke, 46, has tended to vote more
Republican in recent elections (though he supported Ross Perot in
1992), reversing his youthful preference for Democrats. While he
strongly disapproves of abortion, opposes gun control, distrusts the
United Nations and didn't like President Clinton, he is deeply angry
about the jobs being shipped overseas, wants an alternative energy
plan to cut our dependence on oil, and has turned against Bush's tax
cuts. "It seems to me the greedier are getting greedier," he
said. "These tax cuts sounded good, but it didn't trickle down. It
trickled up."

He is torn about the war in Iraq. In the debate, he was irritated by
Bush's smirking, stuttering, "cowboy" manner and was impressed that
Kerry seemed to have a plan for Iraq. "We're there, and things are
starting to look bad," Mahnke said. "You've got to have an exit plan.
I don't think George is thinking properly." But he still leans ever
so slightly to Bush, he said, as Morton handed him a detailed
comparison of the two candidates on the issues and promised to stay
in touch.

The next morning, Republican Brandon Rosner, a 24-year-old engineer
who ran an energetic but ultimately losing campaign for the Milwaukee
City Council last spring, was out in the same neighborhoods, pursuing
people thought to lean Republican but with "spotty voting records."
He had prepared scripts, tailored to what the campaign thought were
each voter's concerns. The first, reinforced by a leaflet handed to
everyone, focused on social issues -- abortion, gay marriage,
judicial conservatism; the second, on taxes; and the third, on an
upbeat but generic account of the president's actions on healthcare
and the economy. The first two voters Rosner encountered -- a
building maintenance engineer and a Teamster truck driver -- said
they were solidly pro-Bush, mainly because they supported Bush's
military action in Iraq.

The next pursuit was Rich Gillard, a steelworker forced into early
retirement when his employer shifted production that had once
employed more than 2,000 workers to Brazil and China. A Rush Limbaugh
ditto-head and avid follower of Fox News, Gillard abandoned the
Democrats for Ronald Reagan, then switched to Perot, and now
denounces illegal immigrants, taxes, mosques in the United States,
abortion and the liberalism of his college-educated kids. He loves
the PATRIOT Act and is willing to let anyone search his house and
even look for the guns he keeps. He's largely resigned to the closing
of factories as inevitable, though he owes his early pension to the
work of his union, which sees Bush as a deadly threat to organized
labor. But he does not see Kerry as an alternative. "What good have
the Democrats done?" he asked. "Who was the guy who instigated NAFTA?
Clinton."

The "lazy Republican" list included a few clinkers. Germaine Jahn,
77, a retired accountant, voted for Bush last time but will not
now. "I don't like the man," she said. "I don't like what he's done
to the economy. He hasn't done anything good. This time I'm going
back to the Democrats." And who knows how Donald Lyons, 64, ended up
on Rosner's list. The machinist had to scramble for seven years to
get a job that paid close to the one he lost in 1990 when his
employer moved out of the country. "The man has no foreign policy,"
Lyons said of Bush. "The economy is worthless. There's nothing for
the middle class. He's killing us, all for tax breaks for people
making over $500,000."

Ever the optimist, Rosner figures his visit will at least help clean
up the list for the next election by removing the Lyons household.
Over the course of the morning, he had handed out two absentee ballot
applications. "There might be two more votes for the president," he
said. "That makes my day."

Two years ago, Republicans launched a final 72-hour get-out-the-vote
effort in Wisconsin and other states after seeing that Democrats
often outperformed them in the preelection polls on Election
Day. "Now the polls have us up quite a bit," said one Bush campaign
strategist in Wisconsin, "but I think it's a lot closer. I think it
will be the ground game -- who can motivate their base and turn them
out -- that will decide it. What we've been doing the whole time is
talking with undecideds: Are you pro-life? Do you hunt? Are you
concerned about national security?"

Most of the Republican ground game is being organized by the party
and the Bush campaign, which claims 41,000 volunteers so far in the
state. (The number includes people working in offices, disseminating
signs and attending parades as well as canvassers and phone bank
operators.) There are some complementary efforts by sympathetic
groups but little on the ground. The National Rifle Association has
run long infomercials and is mailing material to its supporters.

Although there is a strong and influential antiabortion movement, it
seems disconnected from the presidential race. Christian Coalition
national president Roberta Combs says, "We are very focused on
Wisconsin. We plan to do voter guides. We're putting together a
pretty massive grass-roots organization precinct by precinct." But
other conservatives and some Republicans are skeptical. "The
Christian Coalition is kind of anemic" here, says Matt Sande,
spokesman for Pro-Life Wisconsin, which criticizes Bush for
supporting any exceptions to abortion. "It's not existent in
Wisconsin."

Kerry supporters working on the ground, however, are legion, though
they often involve a bewildering array of groups that are related but
distinct because they were established under the tax code as 501(c)3,
501(c)4, 527 or other types of organizations, limiting both any
coordination with the Kerry campaign and to what extent -- if any --
they can advocate for a candidate.

There's also the traditional coordinated effort of the Kerry campaign
itself and the Democratic Party, which claims 100 staff, 23 offices
and 1,600 trained war leaders around the state, many of them working
on phone banks, canvassing and providing support for the frequent
trips of the candidates and surrogates to Wisconsin. But the efforts
beyond the campaign are even more substantial.

The labor movement -- representing 18 percent of the state's
workforce, nearly half again above the national average -- has played
the largest and longest role in direct mobilization. In 2000, polling
indicated that 32 percent of Wisconsin voters came from union
households. And union members vote more Democratic than people just
like them who are not in unions.

"What we've been doing this year is just so far beyond anything we've
ever done or attempted before that there's just no comparison," says
state AFL-CIO president David Newby. "That includes the amount of
communication taking place, the number of staff that unions have
released to work the plan, the degree to which contact with union
members is direct rather than indirect through mail." And labor
leaders, including international union presidents, are doing much
more than previously to keep track of who's doing what and spur
laggards on, state federation executive vice president Sarah Rogers
says.

The unions' grass-roots campaign started much earlier, too. "Activity
hasn't really stopped since four years ago," says Seth Johnson,
political director for Wisconsin AFSCME (public employees). "We've
been campaigning for four years." Unions are sending members lots of
literature, emphasizing the Bush records on jobs, healthcare and
issues such as the right to organize unions and the elimination of
overtime protection for millions of workers, but with only oblique
criticism of the war in Iraq, which the Wisconsin AFL-CIO recently
condemned. The Service Employees International Union, which
nationally is spending $65 million on its political work, has also
run television ads about healthcare.

But the heart of the effort is having union representatives talk to
members at work and union members go door-to-door to talk to fellow
unionists. By September more than 2,000 labor volunteers had reached
at least 65,000 out of roughly 300,000 members at their homes,
including a canvass that took place the evening of Bush's convention
acceptance speech.

The other major ground effort is a newcomer, America Coming Together,
a 527 group that has benefited from the largess of financier George
Soros and other big Democratic donors. ACT's operation is larger than
even labor's, but it also benefits from union support, like the SEIU
Heroes assigned to its canvassing. "We have scores of canvassers,
knocking on doors, dropping literature, taking the pulse of voters,"
says ACT spokesman Phil Walzack. "This allows us to come back and
show how the Bush administration has failed on jobs, healthcare and
education. We've aggressively pushed information about how Bush
shortchanges homeland security, like cutting funding for air
marshals." By late September, according to one account, ACT
representatives had knocked on 900,000 doors in Wisconsin.

There are many smaller initiatives, but nearly all of the advocacy
groups outside the campaign come together under the umbrella of
America Votes, which is also linked to the Media Fund, a 527 group
that runs TV advertising. "What I try to do is make sure they're
talking to each other, sharing information and resources and not
duplicating in ways that don't make sense," says America Votes state
director Peter Shakow. "You don't want the League of Conservation
Voters knocking on a door and 10 minutes later the Sierra Club
knocking on the same door."

Besides environmental groups, America Votes coordinates with ACT, pro-
choice organizations (Planned Parenthood and NARAL Pro-Choice
America), MoveOn.org, organized labor, Citizen Action (a 76,000-
member consumer and citizens' rights group) and other groups focused
on minority voters, youth and students, and gays. Even groups with
similar agendas divide up the electorate. For example, the League of
Conservation Voters is targeting more than 150,000 households with a
broad message on jobs, healthcare, energy independence and the
environment. The smaller Sierra Club Voter Education Project is
targeting undecided voters with a comparison of the two presidential
candidates on national environmental issues in areas where there are
strong local concerns about the environment, such as working-class
south Milwaukee, situated near a sewage-treatment plant, a neglected
Superfund site and four coal-fired power plants.

Even though Wisconsin voters can register on Election Day, there has
been an extensive effort to pre-register young voters (especially on
campuses), minority communities and union members, often by
officially nonpartisan groups that simply register and turn out
voters. But when these efforts target heavily Democratic
constituencies, like African-Americans, Democratic candidates
disproportionately benefit. Citizen Action Fund, for example, works
independently of its parent organization and has registered 28,000
new black and Latino voters. It will contact them and an additional
100,000 infrequent-voter households as many as nine times with
literature and calls about the issues at stake -- "schools over
jails, stopping racial profiling, ending unfair immigration laws,
choosing healthcare over drug company profits, or creating an economy
that creates good jobs," according to fund director Larry Marx.
("Peace over war" was too partisan, lawyers advised.) In one
imaginative twist, the fund has created a service-learning project in
70 schools involving a curriculum on voting rights. As part of the
curriculum, 2,000 schoolchildren in wards with low voter turnout have
been spreading a message to adults throughout the ward: "Vote for me.
I can't."

But the biggest boost for mobilizing African-American voters in
Milwaukee -- and thus a bonus for Kerry -- may be the primary victory
of state Sen. Gwen Moore, who will become the state's first black
representative in Congress if she wins. Meanwhile, Republicans are
trying to suppress the black vote, Walzack charges, for example, by
backing a previously unknown group called People of Color United,
financed by a white Republican millionaire insurance magnate who
promotes health savings accounts and school vouchers, which has taken
out ads in the black community denouncing both tickets as composed
of "superwealthy white men" with no interest in blacks.

In rural areas of the state, both the Kerry campaign and independent
groups are working to mobilize Native Americans, who traditionally
have not participated strongly but lean Democratic, and rural voters,
who are often abandoned to the Republicans. "We're putting
organizations on the ground in north-central and southwest Wisconsin,
finding media in town newspapers and seeing if we can get voters
interested in self-interest economic issues instead of the social
issues of guns, God and gays," says League of Rural Voters director
Niel Ritchie. Still, the Kerry campaign plays up his interest in
hunting in an attempt to neutralize the fears of gun owners. (The NRA
and Republicans have scoffed at Kerry for trying to bolster his
credentials by participating in a skeet shoot in Wisconsin.)

There are limits to even the best grass-roots efforts, however. The
character of the candidates and the campaigns, and external
developments with the war, the economy and even terrorism, are all
potential limiting factors. Although Wisconsin's economy has
rebounded more than that of other Midwestern battleground states,
there has been no net job growth; 75,000 manufacturing jobs were lost
from March 2001 to January 2004, while median family income has been
falling and inequality rising, according to the Center on Wisconsin
Strategy.

The pro-Kerry troops think they will prevail if Kerry can present a
credible alternative to Bush on both the war in Iraq and the fight
against terrorism while giving more of a populist jolt to his message
about jobs and healthcare. "Our war is for those Republicans in our
membership who otherwise agree with us on health and jobs issues,"
says Citizen Action's co-director Bob Hudek. "The war is probably
what's keeping them with Bush. We've seen some data that the war is
helping the president a little bit more in Wisconsin than in some of
the other swing states." But if the war news continues to worsen, the
post-debate response suggests there are anxious voters ready to turn
away from Bush.

"The ultimate question is that we have to be close enough for the
field operations to win it, within three or four points in the
polls," says SEIU state political director Robert Kraig. "If Kerry
gets slaughtered on issues, it's hard to win with a ground operation.
But I don't think the fundamentals of the race have changed. It's a
closely divided state that should go Democratic. We've done
everything to lay the basis for a ground operation -- better than
we've ever had. It will be close, but it's there for the taking."


- - - - - - - - - - - -

About the writer
David Moberg is a senior editor at In These Times and a fellow at the
Nation Institute.

http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2004/10/07/wisconsin/print.html

posted by Rei Toei @ 8:47 p.m.

CHENEY'S BLUNDER DRIVES TRAFFIC

SAN FRANCISCO (CBS.MW) -- Vice President Dick Cheney should have done a
little fact-checking of his own before he told Sen. John Edwards to get
his facts straight during Tuesday's heated face-off between the running
mates.

When urging viewers to visit a Web site that might refute some of
Edwards' statements, Cheney pointed to FactCheck.com, not the intended
FactCheck.org.

Instead, surfers were redirected to a site of outspoken Bush opponent
George Soros, where a message at the top read: "President Bush is
endangering our safety, hurting our vital interests and undermining
American values."

Not exactly what Cheney had in mind.

FactCheck.com is actually owned by an offshore company that peddles
domain names for profit. When the traffic soared following the mention,
the owners relieved their aching servers by linking to Soros' site,
unbeknownst to the billionaire financier.

Furthermore, the intended site didn't even support Cheney's claim that
Edwards was using a smoke screen. In fact, FactCheck.org, which is run
by the Annenberg Center of the University of Pennsylvania, said
"Edwards
was mostly right" regarding the vice president's role in Halliburton's
problems.

posted by Rei Toei @ 1:32 p.m.